Rwanda vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Rwanda
- Singapore
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 23 number against 21 number in Singapore, a difference of 2 number.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 182nd and Singapore ranks 183rd of 184 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.57 number | 21 number | 3.57 number | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 23.4 number | 21 number | 2.4 number | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Rwanda or Singapore?
- Rwanda, at 23 number against 21 number in Singapore as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Rwanda and Singapore?
- 2 number, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Singapore?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Rwanda and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Rwanda ranks 182nd and Singapore ranks 183rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.