Poland vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Poland
33 number
in 2014
United States
33.6 number
in 2014
Poland rank
140th
United States rank
139th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Poland
  • United States
010203040200320082014

How they compare

United States currently reports 33.6 number against 33 number in Poland, a difference of 0.6 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 140th and United States ranks 139th of 181 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland United States Difference Ahead
2000s 37 number 32.43 number 4.57 number Poland
2010s 34.6 number 32.64 number 1.96 number Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Poland or United States?
United States, at 33.6 number against 33 number in Poland as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Poland and United States?
0.6 number, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and United States?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Poland and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Poland ranks 140th and United States ranks 139th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.