Palau vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Palau
37 number
in 2014
Philippines
37 number
in 2014
Palau rank
95th
Philippines rank
95th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Palau
  • Philippines
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Palau currently reports 37 number against 37 number in Philippines, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Palau ahead.

Palau ranks 95th and Philippines ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 38 number 37 number 1 number Palau
2010s 37.6 number 37 number 0.6 number Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Palau or Philippines?
Palau, at 37 number against 37 number in Philippines as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Palau and Philippines?
0 number, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Philippines?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Palau and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Palau ranks 95th and Philippines ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.