Oman vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Oman
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 53 number against 51 number in Oman, a difference of 2 number.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Oman ranks 5th and Sudan ranks 2nd of 184 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51 number | 53.33 number | 2.33 number | Sudan |
| 2010s | 51 number | 53 number | 2 number | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Oman or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 53 number against 51 number in Oman as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Oman and Sudan?
- 2 number, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Oman and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Oman ranks 5th and Sudan ranks 2nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.