Micronesia (country) vs Norway: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Micronesia (country)
34 number
in 2014
Norway
34 number
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
129th
Norway rank
129th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Norway
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Norway, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 129th and Norway ranks 129th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 34 number 34 number 0 number
2010s 34 number 34 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Micronesia (country) or Norway?
Micronesia (country), at 34 number against 34 number in Norway as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Micronesia (country) and Norway?
0 number, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Norway?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Micronesia (country) and Norway rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Micronesia (country) ranks 129th and Norway ranks 129th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.