Mexico vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Mexico
36.83 number
in 2014
Seychelles
36 number
in 2014
Mexico rank
107th
Seychelles rank
108th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Mexico
  • Seychelles
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 36.83 number against 36 number in Seychelles, a difference of 0.83 number.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 107th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 181 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 38 number 37 number 1 number Mexico
2010s 37.33 number 36.8 number 0.532 number Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Mexico or Seychelles?
Mexico, at 36.83 number against 36 number in Seychelles as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Mexico and Seychelles?
0.83 number, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Seychelles?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mexico and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Mexico ranks 107th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.