Mauritius vs Romania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Mauritius
- Romania
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Romania, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 129th and Romania ranks 129th of 181 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.83 number | 34.67 number | 2.17 number | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 35.4 number | 34 number | 1.4 number | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Mauritius or Romania?
- Mauritius, at 34 number against 34 number in Romania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Mauritius and Romania?
- 0 number, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Romania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Romania rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Mauritius ranks 129th and Romania ranks 129th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.