Malaysia vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Malaysia
- South Africa
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 29 number against 29 number in South Africa, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Africa ahead.
Malaysia ranks 164th and South Africa ranks 164th of 181 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 number | 30 number | 0 number | — |
| 2010s | 29.2 number | 29 number | 0.2 number | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Malaysia or South Africa?
- Malaysia, at 29 number against 29 number in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Malaysia and South Africa?
- 0 number, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Malaysia ranks 164th and South Africa ranks 164th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.