Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Malawi
42 number
in 2014
Papua New Guinea
42 number
in 2014
Malawi rank
46th
Papua New Guinea rank
46th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Malawi
  • Papua New Guinea
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 42 number against 42 number in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 46th of 181 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 42.57 number 42.86 number 0.2857 number Papua New Guinea
2010s 42 number 42 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Malawi or Papua New Guinea?
Malawi, at 42 number against 42 number in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
0 number, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Malawi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Malawi ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.