Luxembourg vs Netherlands: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Luxembourg
26 number
in 2014
Netherlands
26 number
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
174th
Netherlands rank
174th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 26 number against 26 number in Netherlands, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 174th and Netherlands ranks 174th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 26 number 26 number 0 number
2010s 26 number 26 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Luxembourg or Netherlands?
Luxembourg, at 26 number against 26 number in Netherlands as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Luxembourg and Netherlands?
0 number, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Netherlands?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Luxembourg and Netherlands rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Luxembourg ranks 174th and Netherlands ranks 174th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.