Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Lesotho
41 number
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
41 number
in 2014
Lesotho rank
51st
Saudi Arabia rank
51st

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Lesotho
  • Saudi Arabia
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 41 number against 41 number in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 51st and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 181 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 41 number 43 number 2 number Saudi Arabia
2010s 41 number 41.8 number 0.8 number Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Lesotho or Saudi Arabia?
Lesotho, at 41 number against 41 number in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
0 number, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Lesotho and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Lesotho ranks 51st and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.