Laos vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Laos
43 number
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
43 number
in 2014
Laos rank
38th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
38th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Laos
  • Sao Tome and Principe
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Laos currently reports 43 number against 43 number in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Laos ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 38th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 43 number 43 number 0 number
2010s 43 number 43 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Laos or Sao Tome and Principe?
Laos, at 43 number against 43 number in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Laos and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 number, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Sao Tome and Principe?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Laos and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Laos ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 38th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.