Kosovo vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Kosovo
- East Timor
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 53 number against 51 number in East Timor, a difference of 2 number.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kosovo has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 2nd and East Timor ranks 5th of 184 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53 number | 51 number | 2 number | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 53 number | 51 number | 2 number | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Kosovo or East Timor?
- Kosovo, at 53 number against 51 number in East Timor as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Kosovo and East Timor?
- 2 number, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and East Timor?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kosovo and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Kosovo ranks 2nd and East Timor ranks 5th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.