South Korea vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

South Korea
32 number
in 2014
Mongolia
32 number
in 2014
South Korea rank
146th
Mongolia rank
146th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • South Korea
  • Mongolia
0102030200320082014

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 32 number against 32 number in Mongolia, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 146th and Mongolia ranks 146th of 181 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 34 number 32 number 2 number South Korea
2010s 32.4 number 32 number 0.4 number South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, South Korea or Mongolia?
South Korea, at 32 number against 32 number in Mongolia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between South Korea and Mongolia?
0 number, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Mongolia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do South Korea and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
South Korea ranks 146th and Mongolia ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.