Kenya vs Palestine: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Kenya
44 number
in 2014
Palestine
44 number
in 2014
Kenya rank
28th
Palestine rank
28th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Kenya
  • Palestine
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 44 number against 44 number in Palestine, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 28th and Palestine ranks 28th of 181 countries.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 40 number 44 number 4 number Palestine
2010s 42.4 number 44 number 1.6 number Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Kenya or Palestine?
Kenya, at 44 number against 44 number in Palestine as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Kenya and Palestine?
0 number, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Palestine?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Kenya and Palestine rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Kenya ranks 28th and Palestine ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.