Kenya vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Kenya
- Suriname
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 44 number against 44 number in Suriname, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 28th and Suriname ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 number | 44 number | 4 number | Suriname |
| 2010s | 42.4 number | 44 number | 1.6 number | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Kenya or Suriname?
- Kenya, at 44 number against 44 number in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Kenya and Suriname?
- 0 number, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kenya and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Kenya ranks 28th and Suriname ranks 28th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.