Kazakhstan vs Yemen: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Kazakhstan
36 number
in 2014
Yemen
36 number
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
108th
Yemen rank
108th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Yemen
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 36 number against 36 number in Yemen, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 108th and Yemen ranks 108th of 181 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 38.14 number 36 number 2.14 number Kazakhstan
2010s 36.8 number 36 number 0.8 number Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Kazakhstan or Yemen?
Kazakhstan, at 36 number against 36 number in Yemen as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Kazakhstan and Yemen?
0 number, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Yemen?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Kazakhstan and Yemen rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Kazakhstan ranks 108th and Yemen ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.