Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 36 number against 36 number in Serbia, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.14 number | 36.86 number | 1.29 number | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 36.8 number | 36 number | 0.8 number | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 36 number against 36 number in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0 number, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Kazakhstan ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 108th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.