Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Kazakhstan
36 number
in 2014
Mexico
36.83 number
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
108th
Mexico rank
107th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mexico
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 36.83 number against 36 number in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.83 number.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 108th and Mexico ranks 107th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 38.14 number 38 number 0.1429 number Kazakhstan
2010s 36.8 number 37.33 number 0.532 number Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Kazakhstan or Mexico?
Mexico, at 36.83 number against 36 number in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Kazakhstan and Mexico?
0.83 number, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mexico?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Kazakhstan and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Kazakhstan ranks 108th and Mexico ranks 107th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.