Jamaica vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Jamaica
35 number
in 2014
Tajikistan
35 number
in 2014
Jamaica rank
120th
Tajikistan rank
120th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Jamaica
  • Tajikistan
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 35 number against 35 number in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 120th and Tajikistan ranks 120th of 181 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 34.4 number 35 number 0.6 number Tajikistan
2010s 35 number 35 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Jamaica or Tajikistan?
Jamaica, at 35 number against 35 number in Tajikistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Jamaica and Tajikistan?
0 number, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Tajikistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Jamaica and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Jamaica ranks 120th and Tajikistan ranks 120th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.