Italy vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Italy
37 number
in 2014
Solomon Islands
37 number
in 2014
Italy rank
95th
Solomon Islands rank
95th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Italy
  • Solomon Islands
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Italy currently reports 37 number against 37 number in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 95th and Solomon Islands ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 40.43 number 37 number 3.43 number Italy
2010s 37 number 37 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Italy or Solomon Islands?
Italy, at 37 number against 37 number in Solomon Islands as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Italy and Solomon Islands?
0 number, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Solomon Islands?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Italy and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Italy ranks 95th and Solomon Islands ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.