Ireland vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Ireland
21 number
in 2014
Rwanda
23 number
in 2014
Ireland rank
180th
Rwanda rank
179th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Ireland
  • Rwanda
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 23 number against 21 number in Ireland, a difference of 2 number.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Ireland ranks 180th and Rwanda ranks 179th of 181 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 21.71 number 24.57 number 2.86 number Rwanda
2010s 21 number 23.4 number 2.4 number Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Ireland or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 23 number against 21 number in Ireland as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Ireland and Rwanda?
2 number, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Rwanda?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Ireland and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Ireland ranks 180th and Rwanda ranks 179th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.