Indonesia vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Indonesia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 40 number against 40 number in Uruguay, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 60th and Uruguay ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.29 number | 40 number | 0.7143 number | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 40 number | 40 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Indonesia or Uruguay?
- Indonesia, at 40 number against 40 number in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Indonesia and Uruguay?
- 0 number, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Indonesia ranks 60th and Uruguay ranks 60th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.