Indonesia vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Indonesia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 40 number against 40 number in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.29 number | 40 number | 0.7143 number | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 40 number | 40 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Indonesia or Sri Lanka?
- Indonesia, at 40 number against 40 number in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 0 number, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Indonesia ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.