India vs Saint Lucia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

India
46 number
in 2014
Saint Lucia
46 number
in 2014
India rank
17th
Saint Lucia rank
17th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • India
  • Saint Lucia
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

India currently reports 46 number against 46 number in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

India ranks 17th and Saint Lucia ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 46 number 46.6 number 0.6 number Saint Lucia
2010s 46 number 46 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, India or Saint Lucia?
India, at 46 number against 46 number in Saint Lucia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between India and Saint Lucia?
0 number, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Saint Lucia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do India and Saint Lucia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
India ranks 17th and Saint Lucia ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.