Hungary vs Romania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Hungary
34 number
in 2014
Romania
34 number
in 2014
Hungary rank
129th
Romania rank
129th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Hungary
  • Romania
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Romania, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 129th and Romania ranks 129th of 181 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 34 number 34.71 number 0.7143 number Romania
2010s 34 number 34 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Hungary or Romania?
Hungary, at 34 number against 34 number in Romania as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Hungary and Romania?
0 number, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Romania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Hungary and Romania rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Hungary ranks 129th and Romania ranks 129th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.