Hungary vs Portugal: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Hungary
34 number
in 2014
Portugal
34 number
in 2014
Hungary rank
129th
Portugal rank
129th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Hungary
  • Portugal
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Portugal, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 129th and Portugal ranks 129th of 181 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 34 number 37.14 number 3.14 number Portugal
2010s 34 number 34 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Hungary or Portugal?
Hungary, at 34 number against 34 number in Portugal as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Hungary and Portugal?
0 number, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Portugal?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Hungary and Portugal rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Hungary ranks 129th and Portugal ranks 129th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.