Hungary vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Hungary
- Mauritius
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Mauritius, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 129th of 181 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34 number | 36.83 number | 2.83 number | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 34 number | 35.4 number | 1.4 number | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Hungary or Mauritius?
- Hungary, at 34 number against 34 number in Mauritius as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Hungary and Mauritius?
- 0 number, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mauritius?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Hungary and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Hungary ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 129th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.