Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Hong Kong
- Netherlands
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 26 number against 26 number in Netherlands, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 174th and Netherlands ranks 174th of 181 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27 number | 26 number | 1 number | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 26.6 number | 26 number | 0.6 number | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Hong Kong or Netherlands?
- Hong Kong, at 26 number against 26 number in Netherlands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Hong Kong and Netherlands?
- 0 number, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Netherlands?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Netherlands rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Hong Kong ranks 174th and Netherlands ranks 174th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.