Hong Kong vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) over time
- Hong Kong
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 27 number against 26 number in Hong Kong, a difference of 1 number.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 177th and Iceland ranks 174th of 184 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27 number | 27 number | 0 number | — |
| 2010s | 26.6 number | 27 number | 0.4 number | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Hong Kong or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 27 number against 26 number in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 1 number, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Hong Kong ranks 177th and Iceland ranks 174th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.