Honduras vs India: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Honduras
47 number
in 2014
India
46 number
in 2014
Honduras rank
14th
India rank
17th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Honduras
  • India
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 47 number against 46 number in India, a difference of 1 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was India ahead.

Honduras ranks 14th and India ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and India in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras India Difference Ahead
2000s 45 number 46 number 1 number India
2010s 46.6 number 46 number 0.6 number Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Honduras or India?
Honduras, at 47 number against 46 number in India as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Honduras and India?
1 number, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and India?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Honduras and India rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Honduras ranks 14th and India ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.