Haiti vs Romania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Haiti
- Romania
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Romania, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Romania ahead.
Haiti ranks 132nd and Romania ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35 number | 34.71 number | 0.2857 number | Haiti |
| 2010s | 34.2 number | 34 number | 0.2 number | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Haiti or Romania?
- Haiti, at 34 number against 34 number in Romania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Haiti and Romania?
- 0 number, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Romania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Haiti and Romania rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Haiti ranks 132nd and Romania ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.