Haiti vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Haiti
34 number
in 2014
Mauritius
34 number
in 2014
Haiti rank
129th
Mauritius rank
129th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Haiti
  • Mauritius
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Mauritius, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Haiti ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 129th of 181 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 35 number 36.83 number 1.83 number Mauritius
2010s 34.2 number 35.4 number 1.2 number Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Haiti or Mauritius?
Haiti, at 34 number against 34 number in Mauritius as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Haiti and Mauritius?
0 number, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Mauritius?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Haiti and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Haiti ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 129th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.