Guyana vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Guyana
- Serbia
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 36 number against 36 number in Serbia, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Serbia ahead.
Guyana ranks 111th and Serbia ranks 111th of 184 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.33 number | 36.5 number | 0.1667 number | Serbia |
| 2010s | 36 number | 36 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Guyana or Serbia?
- Guyana, at 36 number against 36 number in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Guyana and Serbia?
- 0 number, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Serbia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Guyana and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Guyana ranks 111th and Serbia ranks 111th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.