Guyana vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Guyana
36 number
in 2014
Kazakhstan
36 number
in 2014
Guyana rank
108th
Kazakhstan rank
108th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Guyana
  • Kazakhstan
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 36 number against 36 number in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 108th and Kazakhstan ranks 108th of 181 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 36.33 number 37.67 number 1.33 number Kazakhstan
2010s 36 number 36.8 number 0.8 number Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Guyana or Kazakhstan?
Guyana, at 36 number against 36 number in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Guyana and Kazakhstan?
0 number, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Kazakhstan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Guyana and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Guyana ranks 108th and Kazakhstan ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.