Guatemala vs Moldova: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Guatemala
- Moldova
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 31 number against 31 number in Moldova, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 157th and Moldova ranks 157th of 184 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31 number | 30 number | 1 number | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 31 number | 30.6 number | 0.4 number | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Guatemala or Moldova?
- Guatemala, at 31 number against 31 number in Moldova as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Guatemala and Moldova?
- 0 number, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Moldova?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Moldova rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Guatemala ranks 157th and Moldova ranks 157th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.