Greece vs Tanzania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Greece
38 number
in 2014
Tanzania
38 number
in 2014
Greece rank
83rd
Tanzania rank
83rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Greece
  • Tanzania
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Greece currently reports 38 number against 38 number in Tanzania, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 83rd and Tanzania ranks 83rd of 181 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 39 number 38 number 1 number Greece
2010s 38.8 number 38 number 0.8 number Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Greece or Tanzania?
Greece, at 38 number against 38 number in Tanzania as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Greece and Tanzania?
0 number, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Tanzania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Greece and Tanzania rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Greece ranks 83rd and Tanzania ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.