Ghana vs Kyrgyzstan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Ghana
38 number
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan
38 number
in 2014
Ghana rank
83rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
83rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Ghana
  • Kyrgyzstan
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 38 number against 38 number in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 83rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 181 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2000s 36.57 number 38 number 1.43 number Kyrgyzstan
2010s 36.8 number 38 number 1.2 number Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Ghana or Kyrgyzstan?
Ghana, at 38 number against 38 number in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Ghana and Kyrgyzstan?
0 number, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Kyrgyzstan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Ghana and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Ghana ranks 83rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.