Georgia vs Slovakia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Georgia
33 number
in 2014
Slovakia
33 number
in 2014
Georgia rank
140th
Slovakia rank
140th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Georgia
  • Slovakia
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 33 number against 33 number in Slovakia, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 140th and Slovakia ranks 140th of 181 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Slovakia Difference Ahead
2000s 36.43 number 33 number 3.43 number Georgia
2010s 34.2 number 33 number 1.2 number Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Georgia or Slovakia?
Georgia, at 33 number against 33 number in Slovakia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Georgia and Slovakia?
0 number, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Slovakia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Georgia and Slovakia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Georgia ranks 140th and Slovakia ranks 140th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.