Gambia vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Gambia
33 number
in 2014
United States
33.6 number
in 2014
Gambia rank
140th
United States rank
139th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Gambia
  • United States
0102030200320082014

How they compare

United States currently reports 33.6 number against 33 number in Gambia, a difference of 0.6 number.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States ahead.

Gambia ranks 140th and United States ranks 139th of 181 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia United States Difference Ahead
2000s 33 number 32.2 number 0.8 number Gambia
2010s 33 number 32.64 number 0.36 number Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Gambia or United States?
United States, at 33.6 number against 33 number in Gambia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Gambia and United States?
0.6 number, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and United States?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Gambia and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Gambia ranks 140th and United States ranks 139th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.