Gambia vs Georgia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Gambia
33 number
in 2014
Georgia
33 number
in 2014
Gambia rank
140th
Georgia rank
140th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Gambia
  • Georgia
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 33 number against 33 number in Georgia, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 140th and Georgia ranks 140th of 181 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 33 number 36.2 number 3.2 number Georgia
2010s 33 number 34.2 number 1.2 number Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Gambia or Georgia?
Gambia, at 33 number against 33 number in Georgia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Gambia and Georgia?
0 number, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Georgia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Gambia and Georgia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Gambia ranks 140th and Georgia ranks 140th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.