France vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

France
29 number
in 2014
South Africa
29 number
in 2014
France rank
164th
South Africa rank
164th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • France
  • South Africa
0102030200320082014

How they compare

France currently reports 29 number against 29 number in South Africa, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

France ranks 164th and South Africa ranks 164th of 181 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 29 number 30 number 1 number South Africa
2010s 29 number 29 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, France or South Africa?
France, at 29 number against 29 number in South Africa as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between France and South Africa?
0 number, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and South Africa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do France and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
France ranks 164th and South Africa ranks 164th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.