Finland vs Haiti: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Finland
- Haiti
How they compare
Finland currently reports 34 number against 34 number in Haiti, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Haiti has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 132nd and Haiti ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34 number | 35 number | 1 number | Haiti |
| 2010s | 34 number | 34.2 number | 0.2 number | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Finland or Haiti?
- Finland, at 34 number against 34 number in Haiti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Finland and Haiti?
- 0 number, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Haiti?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Haiti rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Finland ranks 132nd and Haiti ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.