Ethiopia vs Kyrgyzstan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Ethiopia
38 number
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan
38 number
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
83rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
83rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Kyrgyzstan
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 38 number against 38 number in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 83rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 181 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2000s 38.86 number 38 number 0.8571 number Ethiopia
2010s 38 number 38 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Ethiopia or Kyrgyzstan?
Ethiopia, at 38 number against 38 number in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Ethiopia and Kyrgyzstan?
0 number, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Kyrgyzstan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Ethiopia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Ethiopia ranks 83rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.