Ethiopia vs Gabon: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Ethiopia
38 number
in 2014
Gabon
38 number
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
83rd
Gabon rank
83rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Gabon
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 38 number against 38 number in Gabon, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 83rd and Gabon ranks 83rd of 181 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Gabon Difference Ahead
2000s 38.8 number 38 number 0.8 number Ethiopia
2010s 38 number 38 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Ethiopia or Gabon?
Ethiopia, at 38 number against 38 number in Gabon as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Ethiopia and Gabon?
0 number, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Gabon?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Ethiopia and Gabon rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Ethiopia ranks 83rd and Gabon ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.