Estonia vs Turkey: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Estonia
- Turkey
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 35 number against 35 number in Turkey, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 120th and Turkey ranks 120th of 181 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.14 number | 36.71 number | 2.57 number | Turkey |
| 2010s | 35 number | 35.8 number | 0.8 number | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Estonia or Turkey?
- Estonia, at 35 number against 35 number in Turkey as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Estonia and Turkey?
- 0 number, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Turkey?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Estonia and Turkey rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Estonia ranks 120th and Turkey ranks 120th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.