Eritrea vs Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Eritrea
39 number
in 2014
Puerto Rico
39 number
in 2014
Eritrea rank
74th
Puerto Rico rank
74th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Eritrea
  • Puerto Rico
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 39 number against 39 number in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 74th and Puerto Rico ranks 74th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 39 number 39 number 0 number
2010s 39 number 39 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Eritrea or Puerto Rico?
Eritrea, at 39 number against 39 number in Puerto Rico as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Eritrea and Puerto Rico?
0 number, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Puerto Rico?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Eritrea and Puerto Rico rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Eritrea ranks 74th and Puerto Rico ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.