Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Equatorial Guinea
40 number
in 2014
Sri Lanka
40 number
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
60th
Sri Lanka rank
60th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sri Lanka
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 40 number against 40 number in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 40 number 40 number 0 number
2010s 40 number 40 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Equatorial Guinea or Sri Lanka?
Equatorial Guinea, at 40 number against 40 number in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
0 number, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.