El Salvador vs Jamaica: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

El Salvador
35 number
in 2014
Jamaica
35 number
in 2014
El Salvador rank
120th
Jamaica rank
120th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • El Salvador
  • Jamaica
010203040200320082014

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 35 number against 35 number in Jamaica, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 120th and Jamaica ranks 120th of 181 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Jamaica Difference Ahead
2000s 32 number 34.29 number 2.29 number Jamaica
2010s 34.4 number 35 number 0.6 number Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, El Salvador or Jamaica?
El Salvador, at 35 number against 35 number in Jamaica as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between El Salvador and Jamaica?
0 number, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jamaica?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do El Salvador and Jamaica rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
El Salvador ranks 120th and Jamaica ranks 120th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.