El Salvador vs Israel: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- El Salvador
- Israel
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 35 number against 35 number in Israel, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 120th and Israel ranks 120th of 181 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32 number | 35 number | 3 number | Israel |
| 2010s | 34.4 number | 35 number | 0.6 number | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, El Salvador or Israel?
- El Salvador, at 35 number against 35 number in Israel as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between El Salvador and Israel?
- 0 number, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Israel?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Israel rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- El Salvador ranks 120th and Israel ranks 120th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.